Chances are, you're here because of Google's update to its search algorithm, which affects both desktop and mobile, and which includes Core Web Vitals as a ranking factor. You may also be here because you've heard about the most recent potential candidates for addition to Core Web Vitals, which were just announced at Chrome Dev Summit.
A few things are clear:
If you're new to Core Web Vitals, this is a Google initiative that was launched in early 2020. Web Vitals is (currently) a set of three metrics – Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift – that are intended to measure the loading, interactivity, and visual stability of a page.
When Google talks, people listen. I talk with a lot of companies and I can attest that, since Web Vitals were announced, they've shot to the top of many people's list of things to care about. But Google's prioritization of page speed in search ranking isn't new, even for mobile. As far back as 2013, Google announced that pages that load slowly on mobile devices would be penalized in mobile search.
Keep reading to find out:
Performance has had an impact on SEO long before Web Vitals came along.
Back in 2011, Smartfurniture.com shared:
"We discovered we could make a quantum leap in search engine rankings simply by increasing site performance. Across the board, we’ve seen sales increases because of our improved ranking, with 20% more organic traffic being driven to our site and 14% more page views."
As much as I'm an advocate for performance, I'm a greater advocate for overall user experience. And when it comes to user experience, quality content is still king. Google acknowledges this as well, which warms my heart:
"While page experience is important, Google still seeks to rank pages with the best information overall, even if the page experience is subpar. Great page experience doesn't override having great page content. However, in cases where there are many pages that may be similar in relevance, page experience can be much more important for visibility in Search."
Assuming that your content is amazing, let's move on to the next question. :)
In the big picture, SEO is about more than Google and Core Web Vitals.
However, Google has a global market share of almost 87%, and it's the only search engine that factors page speed into its algorithm. So for our purposes as web performance folks, Google controls where the goal posts go.
As said, Google has drawn a clear line from search to performance with Core Web Vitals. Currently, these are the metrics that comprise Web Vitals:
Google has also defined thresholds for "Good", "Needs Improvement", and "Poor". These are the same thresholds that you see in our Vitals dashboard, pictured here:
You should know that Google is exploring other goals and metrics for potential inclusion in Web Vitals down the road:
Okay, that was a trick question. I don't believe you should be making your pages faster for SEO purposes.
You should be making your pages leaner and faster because it makes your users happier and consumes less of their data, especially on mobile devices. Not surprisingly, happier users spend more time (and more money) on your site, are more likely to return, and are more likely to recommend your site to others.
Having said that, there are a number of things you can do to fix your pages, improve user experience, and ultimately boost your Web Vitals results. If you want to make your pages faster, the first places to look at are images and render-blocking resources. I'm not a developer and don't pretend to be one, so here are some great resources from devs and engineers who are very well versed in Web Vitals (and performance in general).
Google engineer Addy Osmani recently did a great talk about image optimization at Smashing Meets for Speed. A quick summary of his main tips:
For faster LCP...
For lower CLS...
For better FID...
There are so many common page elements – such as carousels, banners, videos, and custom fonts – that can have a serious negative impact on your performance metrics. This is a handy collection of common UX patterns – including code examples that you can use on your own pages – that have been optimized for Core Web Vitals.
You can track Web Vitals in both Synthetic and RUM. Your Synthetic tests also include Lighthouse scores and audits for each test run.
Before you do anything else, you need to understand how your pages perform relative to Google's thresholds. It's important to note that Google advises that you focus on RUM data at the 75th percentile. If you're using SpeedCurve RUM, that's what we show you by default in your Vitals dashboard.
If you're not using RUM, then you can see your median Synthetic results for Largest Contentful Paint, Total Blocking Time, and Cumulative Layout Shift. (We can't show you First Input Delay, as that's an interaction metric that can only be gathered from real users.) While we plot these metrics against Google's recommended thresholds, take this with a grain of salt, as synthetic test results tend to be slower than RUM. If you're only using synthetic testing, the more important thing to focus on is establishing a baseline for your pages.
MORE: Using the Vitals dashboard [VIDEO]
You can create as many dashboards as you like in your Favorites. You can create a dashboard that focuses solely on search-related metrics, including separate charts for each of the Web Vitals and Lighthouse SEO scores. It can look as simple as this:
Remember that your dashboards and charts don't have to be complex, because you can use the filters at the top of the dashboard to refine your charts:
MORE: Tracking Web Vitals with SpeedCurve [VIDEO]
A performance budget is a numeric threshold that you apply to your metrics. You can then configure your monitoring tools to send you alerts – or even break the build, if you're testing in your staging environment – when your budgets are violated. You can learn much more about performance budgets here, but for our purposes in this post, the important thing to understand is that performance budgets are NOT the same as performance goals:
A good practice is to look at your last 2-4 weeks of data for a given metric, identify the worst number, and then set your performance budget for that number. For example, looking at the last month of LCP data (captured using RUM, at the 75th percentile), we see that the worst number was 2.02 seconds. So a good performance budget for LCP would be 2.02 seconds.
If you have both RUM and synthetic data, it can be helpful to plot both in the same chart. That way, if you get an alert on one of your RUM metrics, you can drill down into your synthetic test data, which is where your Lighthouse scores and audits live, along with your waterfall charts and other diagnostic information. For example, by adding synthetic test data to the same chart we looked at above, we can see that there's a spike in the LCP number for synthetic alongside the high LCP number in RUM:
Clicking the 'View Test' link takes you to detailed test results, where you can:
Performance and SEO are always evolving. That means you need to stay up to date on which metrics to track and how those metrics are faring on your own pages. You should routinely audit your metrics and your performance budgets – ideally on a monthly basis.
If you have any insights, feedback, or questions, I'd love to hear it! Reply in the comments or send us a note at firstname.lastname@example.org.